South Norfolk, Virginia
A Demographic Study
|
South
Norfolk Historic District is a national historic district located at
Chesapeake, Virginia. The district encompasses 668 contributing buildings and 1
contributing site in what started as a planned community of Norfolk County,
Virginia and grew to become an independent city. South Norfolk was never part
of Norfolk, Virginia. In fact, the two cities are separated by the Eastern
Branch of the Elizabeth River.
Area:
480 acres
Added
to NRHP: January 27, 1989
NRHP
Reference Number: 88003133
South Norfolk is a primarily residential
district that was developed between 1890 and 1930. The dwellings include
representative examples of the Colonial Revival, Stick Style, and Queen Anne
styles. The district also includes several churches, a school, a park, and a
small local business district.[3]
It
was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1989.[1]
References
1.
National Park Service (2010-07-09).
"National Register Information System". National Register of Historic
Places. National Park Service.
"Virginia Landmarks Register". Virginia Department of Historic
Resources. Retrieved 5 June 2013.
Priscilla M. Thompson and Barbara E. Benson
(July 1987). "National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination:
South Norfolk Historic District" (PDF). Virginia Department of Historic
Resources. and Accompanying photo and Accompanying map.
|
Located
a few miles south of the larger city of Norfolk along the Southern Branch
Elizabeth River, South Norfolk became an incorporated town in Norfolk County in
1919. Within three years, it became an independent city.
In
the early 1920s, streetcars ran from Ocean View in Norfolk, to South Norfolk.
There was a ferry that docked at the end of Indian River Road and crossed the
Southern Branch Elizabeth River to Portsmouth.
The
much larger independent city of Norfolk expanded rapidly into the adjacent
communities after World War II. In 1963, after a referendum in South Norfolk
and Norfolk County and with approval from the Virginia General Assembly, South
Norfolk and Norfolk County merged to form the independent city of Chesapeake in
1963. The new name was also selected through a voter referendum.
Historical
population
Census
Pop. %±
1920 7,724 —
1930 7,857 1.7%
1940 8,038 2.3%
1950 10,434 29.8%
1960 22,035 111.2%
1920-1960 Population as the City of South
Norfolk
|
It's South Norfolk folks, not "SoNo."
The new catch-phrase for South Norfolk, etymologically, "sono" from the Latin "somnus" or "sonus," meaning "sleep; state of sleep;" or as a Latin verb, "sono," meaning, "make a noise;" take your pick, (both ring hollow) has been used of late as a marketing ploy, to prey on the masses as a come-on, to shop or live in South Norfolk. "SONO"...are we talking about the Japanese Resturant? Maybe the financial stock, "Sono." Or "Sono" the rock band in Hamburg, Germany.
A historic district or heritage district is a section of a city, which contains older buildings considered valuable for historical or architectural reasons. "SoNo" does nothing to enhance that definition. Only a bourgeois, down-market, de clase
baja individual could have come up with that moniker to denote what is
suppose to be a 'historic' district.
|
FDRs "New Deal" sponsored a system of "Redlining" which included the South Norfolk area.
In the 1960s, sociologist
John McKnight coined the term "redlining" to describe the
discriminatory practice of fencing off areas where banks would avoid investments
based on community demographics. During the heyday of redlining, the areas most
frequently discriminated against were black inner city neighborhoods.
In South Norfolk, there was a systematic attempt in the 1930s, to prevent quality growth in South Norfolk. Middle Class residents and small business interests were discouraged from buying and investing in those areas that were "redlinned."
|
Information demographics from the "redlining" program with the negative "spin" on the South Norfolk area:
|
Note the negative appraisal of South Norfolk in this "New Deal" era report:
|
|
1930
|
1940
|
Population
|
129,710
|
144,332
|
Native-born
white
|
62.6%
|
65.5%
|
African
American
|
33.9%
|
31.8%
|
Foreign-born
white
|
3.3%
|
2.5%
|
- Description and Characteristics of
Area A level area about 60% built up. A new development of small homes is
taking place in the southerly portion of the area. The majority of the new
houses are bungalows of fair construction built on lots 50 x 100 feet.
Elsewhere in the area a few two-family houses have been built within the
last twelve months, ranging in the neighborhood of $6,500. A majority of
the streets in the area are hard surfaced, but there are no sidewalks.
Street lighting is poor. There is new high school and playground in the
approximate center of the area. Grade schools, churches and neighborhood
stores are considered convenient. Chesapeake Ave. and Jackson Ave. are
principal thoroughfares. Adequate transportation is afforded by streetcar.
The new construction about referred to is not proceeding rapidly and is
not of such a nature as to improve the general grade of the neighborhood,
and its future is questionable since the area is outlying and too close to
fertilizer plants located to the south and west. The tracks of the Norfolk
& Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad are adjacent to the south and the area
is surrounded by sparsely settled sections inhabited by mixed population,
so that approach is poor.
- Population
- Shifting or
Infiltration: none
- Foreign
Families0%
Nationalities empty - Negro empty
- Class and
Occupation: Merchants - clerks - mechanics - few professional
|
The map below, developed in the 1930s, shows the center of what is now called "Historic South Norfolk" in 'Yellow' which indicates "Definitely Declining." The North and East side is denoted in 'Red' which indicates "Hazardous." This was a blatant attempt to keep South Norfolk from developing into a prospering city. "D" and "C" areas were created to attract minorities and lower middle class whites.
The maps became self-fulfilling prophesies, as “hazardous” neighborhoods
— “redlined” ones — were starved of investment and deteriorated further
in ways that most likely also fed white flight and rising racial
segregation. These neighborhood classifications were later used by the
Veterans Administration and the Federal Housing Administration to decide
who was worthy of home loans at a time when homeownership was rapidly
expanding in postwar America.
|
As of 1930, there were already clear
differences along some of the borders in racial demographics and homeownership
rates. Blacks and Lower Middle Class Whites were already more likely to be living in “D” neighborhoods than
“C” neighborhoods, for example. But differences in the black share of the
population and homeownership rates widened after the 1930s, reaching a peak in
the 1970s, when federal laws requiring equal access to housing and credit took
effect.
People living in poorly rated neighborhoods would have had trouble obtaining
mortgages for homes there, regardless of their individual creditworthiness.
Other consequences most likely piled up from there.
“The
availability of credit has really significant impacts on every dimension of
neighborhood life, in terms of the quality of real estate, the willingness of
investors to come in, the prices of property, the emergence of predatory
practices,” said Thomas Sugrue, a historian at New York University. “These are
all direct consequences of the lack of affordable loans and affordable
mortgages.”
Lower
Middle Class families who did not have access to conventional home loans had to
turn to schemes like contract sales that entailed steep interest rates (the
practice returning today in many of
these same communities). Because those homes could be frequently repossessed by
predatory lenders, these neighborhoods would experience more population
instability.
Slumlords,
too, would move in, squeezing value from subdivided rental homes that otherwise
might have been owned by families. Commercial investors, meanwhile, would have
stayed away. Individuals discriminated against in the housing market elsewhere
would have had limited options to move away. And any existing homeowners would
have struggled to obtain credit for maintenance and repairs, leading to the
further deterioration of properties.
This
process can be invisible to people who might look at these communities, Mr.
Sugrue said, and place blame for their disrepair on residents who don’t value
their homes.
Several prominent professional men in the late 1990s thru the 2000s, attempted to renovate and restore many of the run-down homes in the historic section of South Norfolk. One whom I knew in particular, nearly went bankrupt in taking on this venture.
|
South Norfolk Poindexter Strategic Development Plan
|
|
|